Honor Magic7 Pro vs Oppo Reno15 (China)

The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Oppo Reno15 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 79/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno15 (China) has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5270); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,433 vs 2,016,572); the Oppo Reno15 (China) is noticeably lighter (187g vs 223g).

The Honor Magic7 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno15 (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic7 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 74

Oppo Reno15 (China)

Performance 76
Display 85
Camera 94
Battery 64
Portability 67
Value for money —

What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014433 vs 2016572
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1612
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 6210
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 64/100)

What makes Oppo Reno15 (China) better?

  • Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5270 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 187g vs 223g

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (67/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Oppo Reno15 (China), the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 3 points higher (82/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) leads (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (67/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Oppo Reno15 (China): The Oppo Reno15 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic7 Pro Oppo Reno15 (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8450
AnTuTu 3014433 2016572
Geekbench Single 3057 1612
Geekbench Multi 9302 6210
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.3" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 1216x2640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 6200 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Wireless charging 80W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 148 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16, ColorOS 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP68
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 151.2×72.4×8.0 mm
Weight 223 g 187 g
Launch price $1099 —

Camera comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera

Oppo Reno15 (China)

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Oppo Reno15 (China)

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

Oppo Reno15 (China)

  • 6200 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Oppo Reno15 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3014433 AnTuTu
Oppo Reno15 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 8450
79/100 -49.5%
2016572 AnTuTu

Honor Magic7 Pro leads Oppo Reno15 (China) by 49.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic7 Pro

$1099

Oppo Reno15 (China)

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (91/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) and the Honor Magic7 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (80/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (67/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Oppo Reno15 (China)?

The Honor Magic7 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno15 (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Oppo Reno15 (China)?

The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Oppo Reno15 (China) — 79/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Oppo Reno15 (China)?

The Oppo Reno15 (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 79/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Oppo Reno15 (China)?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Oppo Reno15 (China)?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Oppo Reno15 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.