Honor Magic7 Pro vs OPPO Reno 16 F
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the OPPO Reno 16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $899 and $480. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 85/100 vs 63/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5850); the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 F is noticeably lighter (194g vs 223g).
Honor Magic7 Pro
OPPO Reno 16 F
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5850 mAh
- Lighter: 194g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $480 vs $899
- Better portability (58/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the OPPO Reno 16 F, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 22 points higher (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (82/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 82/100, OPPO Reno 16 F — 54/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 F notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (58/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | OPPO Reno 16 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $480 |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno 16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and OPPO Reno 16 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 Pro leads OPPO Reno 16 F by 255.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $419. OPPO Reno 16 F was $419 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (87/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 F notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (58/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F by 22 points (85/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 85/100, the OPPO Reno 16 F — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The OPPO Reno 16 F is a better fit for everyday use.