Honor Magic7 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4; launch prices were $1099 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 68/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 5200); the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,433 vs 1,355,225); the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is noticeably lighter (195g vs 223g).

The Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic7 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 74

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

Performance 66
Display 80
Camera 78
Battery 53
Portability 62
Value for money 60

What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014433 vs 1355225
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 1270
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 4106
  • Bigger battery: 5270 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better camera (79/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Nothing Phone (4a) Pro better?

  • Lighter: 195g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $1099

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 14 points higher (82/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 74/100, Nothing Phone (4a) Pro — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (80/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (62/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro: The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic7 Pro Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
AnTuTu 3014433 1355225
Geekbench Single 3057 1270
Geekbench Multi 9302 4106
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1280 2412x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 80W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 148 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP65
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 163.7×76.6×8.0 mm
Weight 223 g 195 g
Launch price $1099 $449

Camera comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic7 Pro

  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Nothing Phone (4a) Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3014433 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
68/100 -122.4%
1355225 AnTuTu

Honor Magic7 Pro leads Nothing Phone (4a) Pro by 122.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic7 Pro

$1099

Nothing Phone (4a) Pro

$449

Launch price difference: $650. Nothing Phone (4a) Pro was $650 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (91/100 vs 66/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (80/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro notably outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (62/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro — 68/100.

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 66/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Nothing Phone (4a) Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Nothing Phone (4a) Pro is a better fit for active users.