Honor Magic4 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

The Honor Magic4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads — 61/100 vs 42/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic4 has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 1,290,942); the Honor Magic4 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is noticeably better than the Honor Magic4 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4
Performance 18
Display 100
Camera 49
Battery 43
Design 51
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 76
Battery 25
Design 31
Value for money 0
What makes Honor Magic4 better?
  • Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g

  • Longer battery life (43/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 1290942
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 4453
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic4 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 19 points higher (61/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (67/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 leads (43/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic4 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 (67/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 (76/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (43/100 vs 25/100). In the "design" category, the Honor Magic4 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (51/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic4 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (55/100 vs 0/100).

Honor Magic4: The Honor Magic4 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic4 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1290942 3065623
Geekbench Single 1675 2910
Geekbench Multi 4453 9174
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1224x2664 2184x1968
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 66W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 145
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 10 MP
Front camera 12 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP48
Dimensions 163.6×74.5×8.8 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 199 g 215 g
Price $1999
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 12MP
49
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic4
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2664
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
25
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic4 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
42/100
1290942 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
61/100 +57.9%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Honor Magic4 by 57.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Honor Magic4
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
$1999
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 (67/100 vs 18/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 (76/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (43/100 vs 25/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Honor Magic4 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (51/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic4 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is noticeably better than the Honor Magic4 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Honor Magic4 has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on performance (67/100 vs 18/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic4 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Honor Magic4 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users.