Honor Magic4 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Honor Magic4 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 67/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition edges out the Honor Magic4 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4 Pro
Performance 69
Display 85
Camera 62
Battery 66
Portability 42
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Honor Magic4 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 204g vs 209g

  • Better camera (86/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic4 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 4 points higher (71/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro leads (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 69/100. In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Honor Magic4 Pro: The Honor Magic4 Pro is a better fit for active users.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic4 Pro ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 1290942 1290942
Geekbench Single 1675 1675
Geekbench Multi 4453 4453
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1312x2848 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Wireless charging 100W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 126
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 64 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.6×74.7×9.1 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 209 g 204 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 12MP
62
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic4 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1312x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4 Pro
  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 100W
66
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic4 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
67/100
1290942 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100
1290942 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 69/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (86/100 vs 62/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition edges out the Honor Magic4 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Honor Magic4 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Honor Magic4 Pro is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.