Honor Magic4 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

The Honor Magic4 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads — 57/100 vs 46/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic4 Pro has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4300); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 1,290,942); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 209g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably better than the Honor Magic4 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4 Pro
Performance 18
Display 100
Camera 62
Battery 46
Design 38
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Performance 77
Display 100
Camera 30
Battery 23
Design 75
Value for money 34
What makes Honor Magic4 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W

  • Better camera (62/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 23/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 1290942
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3271 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11051 vs 4453
  • Lighter: 180g vs 209g

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 18/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic4 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 scores 11 points higher (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (77/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro leads (62/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro leads (46/100 vs 23/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro leads (55/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (77/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (62/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (46/100 vs 23/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (75/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (55/100 vs 34/100).

Honor Magic4 Pro: The Honor Magic4 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic4 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 1290942 3161830
Geekbench Single 1675 3271
Geekbench Multi 4453 11051
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1312x2848 1080x2520
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 4300 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 126
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 163.6×74.7×9.1 mm
Weight 209 g 180 g
Price $1099
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 12MP
62
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
30
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic4 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1312x2848
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4 Pro
  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
23
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic4 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic4 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
46/100
1290942 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
57/100 +59.2%
3161830 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Honor Magic4 Pro by 59.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Honor Magic4 Pro
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
$1099
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (77/100 vs 18/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (62/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (46/100 vs 23/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic4 Pro (75/100 vs 38/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (55/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably better than the Honor Magic4 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Honor Magic4 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Honor Magic4 Pro leads on camera score (62/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (77/100 vs 18/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Honor Magic4 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.