Honor Magic4 Pro vs Poco F4 GT
The Honor Magic4 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Poco F4 GT (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic4 Pro leads — 67/100 vs 61/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F4 GT has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Poco F4 GT is faster in AnTuTu (1,303,229 vs 1,290,942).
Honor Magic4 Pro
Poco F4 GT
- Lighter: 209g vs 210g
- Better camera (62/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 79/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1303229 vs 1290942
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better portability (47/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic4 Pro vs the Poco F4 GT, the Honor Magic4 Pro scores 6 points higher (67/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro leads (62/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 69/100. In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (62/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (47/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic4 Pro | Poco F4 GT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1290942 | 1303229 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1675 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4453 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1312x2848 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 100W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 126 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.7×9.1 mm | 162.5×76.7×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 210 g | |
| Price | — | $600 |
Honor Magic4 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 12MP
Poco F4 GT
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor Magic4 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1312x2848
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F4 GT
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic4 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 100W
Poco F4 GT
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic4 Pro and Poco F4 GT, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F4 GT leads Honor Magic4 Pro by 0.9% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic4 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 69/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (62/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT is a bit better (47/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Poco F4 GT?
The Honor Magic4 Pro edges out the Poco F4 GT by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Pro and the Poco F4 GT?
The Honor Magic4 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Poco F4 GT — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Pro or the Poco F4 GT?
The Honor Magic4 Pro leads on camera score (62/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Pro over the Poco F4 GT?
The Honor Magic4 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco F4 GT is a better fit for active users.