Honor Magic V6 vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Honor Magic V6 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic V6 leads — 82/100 vs 48/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic V6 has the bigger battery (6660 mAh vs 6500); the Honor Magic V6 is faster in AnTuTu (4,166,339 vs 528,398); the Honor Magic V6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y300 (China) is noticeably lighter (200g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V6
Vivo Y300 (China)
What makes Honor Magic V6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4166339 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 6660 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (69/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 (China) better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 236g
- Better portability (61/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V6 vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Honor Magic V6 scores 34 points higher (82/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (69/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic V6 and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (69/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V6 | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 4166339 | 528398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 1980 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2848x2076 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6660 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 40 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 156.7×145.6×4.0 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 236 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $1599 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V6
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 40MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2848x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V6
- 6660 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 66W
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic V6 and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic V6 leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 688.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (98/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic V6 and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (69/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (78/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V6 or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 34 points (82/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V6 and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor Magic V6 has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V6 or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on camera score (69/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V6 or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on performance (98/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V6 over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor Magic V6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.