Honor Magic V6 vs Tecno Camon iACE2X
The Honor Magic V6 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon iACE2X (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic V6 leads — 82/100 vs 22/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic V6 has the bigger battery (6660 mAh vs 3050); the Honor Magic V6 is faster in AnTuTu (4,166,339 vs 155,362); the Honor Magic V6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon iACE2X doesn't; the Tecno Camon iACE2X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V6
Tecno Camon iACE2X
What makes Honor Magic V6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4166339 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 6660 vs 3050 mAh
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Tecno Camon iACE2X better?
- Lighter: 150g vs 236g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V6 vs the Tecno Camon iACE2X, the Honor Magic V6 scores 60 points higher (82/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (98/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 leads (78/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (98/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (78/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2X notably outperforms the Honor Magic V6 (78/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V6 | Tecno Camon iACE2X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio A22 | |
| AnTuTu | 4166339 | 155362 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 300 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 486 | |
| Display | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2848x2076 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6660 mAh | 3050 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Ultrawide | 40 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 156.7×145.6×4.0 mm | 148.3×71.9×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 236 g | 150 g | |
| Launch price | $1599 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V6
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 40MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2848x2076
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V6
- 6660 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 66W
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- 3050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic V6 and Tecno Camon iACE2X, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic V6 leads Tecno Camon iACE2X by 2581.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon iACE2X
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (98/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (83/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (78/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2X notably outperforms the Honor Magic V6 (78/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon iACE2X?
The Honor Magic V6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X by 60 points (82/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V6 and the Tecno Camon iACE2X?
The Honor Magic V6 has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Tecno Camon iACE2X — 22/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V6 or the Tecno Camon iACE2X?
The Honor Magic V6 leads on performance (98/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V6 over the Tecno Camon iACE2X?
The Honor Magic V6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.