Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

The Honor Magic 7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads — 82/100 vs 75/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic 7 Pro has the bigger battery (5270 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 3,018,146); per DXOMark lab testing, the Honor Magic 7 Pro has the stronger camera (148 vs 145); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.8mm).

The Honor Magic 7 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic 7 Pro
Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 79
Battery 80
Portability 36
Value for money 76
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 54
What makes Honor Magic 7 Pro better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3057 vs 2910
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9302 vs 9174
  • Bigger battery: 5270 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1999

  • Better camera (79/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 3018146
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 215g vs 223g

  • Better portability (66/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic 7 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the Honor Magic 7 Pro scores 7 points higher (82/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro leads (80/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Honor Magic 7 Pro — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 54/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 91/100. In the "display" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (66/100 vs 36/100).

Honor Magic 7 Pro: The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor Magic 7 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3018146 3065623
Geekbench Single 3057 2910
Geekbench Multi 9302 9174
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2800x1280 2184x1968
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5270 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 80W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 148 145
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / MagicOS 9.0 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP48
Dimensions 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 223 g 215 g
Launch price $1099 $1999
Camera comparison
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
79
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera
Display comparison
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Honor Magic 7 Pro
  • 5270 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:07 hrs, total 26:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
80
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic 7 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
3018146 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 +1.5%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Honor Magic 7 Pro by 1.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic 7 Pro
$1099
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
$1999

Launch price difference: $900. Honor Magic 7 Pro was $900 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 91/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 76/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic 7 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (80/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Honor Magic 7 Pro (66/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic 7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 75/100.

Should you choose the Honor Magic 7 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Honor Magic 7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.