Honor 70 vs Vivo V40e
The Honor 70 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the Vivo V40e (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. Both devices score the same overall rating of 57/100. Key differences: the Vivo V40e has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 54 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo V40e is faster in AnTuTu (879,714 vs 820,210); the Honor 70 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo V40e doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 70
Vivo V40e
What makes Honor 70 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 1059 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3012 vs 2813
- Better main camera: 54MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 178g vs 183g
- Better camera (53/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo V40e better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 879714 vs 820210
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Longer battery life (62/100 vs 49/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 73/100)
Comparison verdict
The Honor 70 and the Vivo V40e received the same MobileRank rating — 57/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e leads (62/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e is a bit better (62/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40e and the Honor 70 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 73/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 70 | Vivo V40e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 820210 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1059 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3012 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 115 | — | |
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×73.3×7.9 mm | 163.7×75.0×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor 70
- Main: 54MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo V40e
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Honor 70
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40e
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 70
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40e
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 70 and Vivo V40e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo V40e leads Honor 70 by 6.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo V40e is a bit better (62/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40e and the Honor 70 are nearly equal (74/100 vs 73/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 70 or the Vivo V40e?
Both devices scored 57/100. They are identical on performance — 55/100 for both. The clearest difference is battery life: better on the Vivo V40e (62/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 70 and the Vivo V40e?
The Honor 70 has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo V40e — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 70 or the Vivo V40e?
The Honor 70 leads on camera score (53/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor 70 over the Vivo V40e?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo V40e (62/100 vs 49/100).