Honor 70 vs Realme GT 8
The Honor 70 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the Realme GT 8 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 8 leads — 66/100 vs 38/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT 8 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 54 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 70 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 209g).
Honor 70
Realme GT 8
- Better main camera: 54MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 178g vs 209g
- Better camera (53/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 38/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (65/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (70/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor 70 vs the Realme GT 8, the Realme GT 8 scores 28 points higher (66/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 leads (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 leads (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme GT 8 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 significantly outperforms the Honor 70 (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 and the Realme GT 8 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 notably outperforms the Honor 70 (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 70 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 8 (77/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme GT 8 significantly outperforms the Honor 70 (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 70 | Realme GT 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2760000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3136 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 115 | — | |
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×73.3×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 178 g | 209 g | |
| Price | — | $350 |
Honor 70
- Main: 54MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Realme GT 8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor 70
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT 8
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3136
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor 70
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 8
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Honor 70
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 significantly outperforms the Honor 70 (65/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 and the Realme GT 8 are nearly equal (53/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 notably outperforms the Honor 70 (70/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 70 significantly outperforms the Realme GT 8 (77/100 vs 38/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme GT 8 significantly outperforms the Honor 70 (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 70 or the Realme GT 8?
The Realme GT 8 significantly outperforms the Honor 70 by 28 points (66/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 70 and the Realme GT 8?
The Honor 70 has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Realme GT 8 — 66/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor 70 or the Realme GT 8?
The Realme GT 8 leads on performance (65/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 70 over the Realme GT 8?
The Honor 70 is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme GT 8 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.