Honor 70 Pro vs Vivo Y31d
The Honor 70 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8000, while the Vivo Y31d (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 70 Pro leads — 40/100 vs 33/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y31d has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 54 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 70 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y31d doesn't; the Honor 70 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 219g).
Honor 70 Pro
Vivo Y31d
- Faster charging: 100W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 54MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 219g
- Better camera (63/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 26/100)
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 44/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor 70 Pro vs the Vivo Y31d, the Honor 70 Pro scores 7 points higher (40/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 Pro leads (63/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (57/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (63/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d is a bit better (57/100 vs 44/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (60/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Pro (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 70 Pro | Vivo Y31d | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 522680 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 489 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1532 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1200x2652 | 720x1570 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7200 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 54 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1250 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×74.6×8.2 mm | 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 219 g | |
| Price | — | $185 |
Honor 70 Pro
- Main: 54MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y31d
- Main: 50MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Honor 70 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1200x2652
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y31d
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 70 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y31d
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Honor 70 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (63/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y31d is a bit better (57/100 vs 44/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y31d (60/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y31d significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Pro (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 70 Pro or the Vivo Y31d?
The Honor 70 Pro edges out the Vivo Y31d by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 70 Pro and the Vivo Y31d?
The Honor 70 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo Y31d — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 70 Pro or the Vivo Y31d?
The Honor 70 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Honor 70 Pro over the Vivo Y31d?
The Honor 70 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y31d is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.