Honor 70 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
The Honor 70 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8000, while the Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 70 Pro leads — 40/100 vs 13/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A03s has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 54 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor 70 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03s doesn't.
Honor 70 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Better main camera: 54MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 192g vs 196g
- Better camera (63/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (44/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor 70 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A03s, the Honor 70 Pro scores 27 points higher (40/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 Pro leads (63/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (63/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 70 Pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 70 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 70 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 828 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1200x2652 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Main camera | 54 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×74.6×8.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 196 g | |
| Price | — | $130 |
Honor 70 Pro
- Main: 54MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Honor 70 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1200x2652
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Honor 70 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Honor 70 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (63/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 70 Pro is a bit better (44/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 70 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Honor 70 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 70 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Honor 70 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 27 points (40/100 vs 13/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 70 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Honor 70 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03s — 13/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 70 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Honor 70 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 70 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Honor 70 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.