Honor 600e vs Nokia C32
The Honor 600e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite, while the Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600e leads — 37/100 vs 16/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600e has the bigger battery (6520 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 600e has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't; the Honor 600e is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Honor 600e
Nokia C32
- Bigger battery: 6520 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 16/100
Comparing the Honor 600e vs the Nokia C32, the Honor 600e scores 21 points higher (37/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600e leads (40/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600e leads (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600e leads (72/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (40/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (75/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (72/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 600e | Nokia C32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite | Unisoc SC9863A1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1200x2600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6520 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP66 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.4×75.4×7.3 mm | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $550 | — |
Honor 600e
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor 600e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 600e
- 6520 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C32
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (40/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (54/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (75/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 600e notably outperforms the Nokia C32 (72/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 600e or the Nokia C32?
The Honor 600e significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 21 points (37/100 vs 16/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 600e and the Nokia C32?
The Honor 600e has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Nokia C32 — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 600e or the Nokia C32?
The Honor 600e leads on camera score (40/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600e over the Nokia C32?
The Honor 600e is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use.