Honor 600 Pro vs Motorola Frontier 22
The Honor 600 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Frontier 22 (2022) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 600 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 71/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 600 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the Honor 600 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,042,805 vs 1,290,942).
Honor 600 Pro
Motorola Frontier 22
- Higher AnTuTu: 3042805 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 50W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 54/100)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor 600 Pro vs the Motorola Frontier 22, the Honor 600 Pro scores 13 points higher (84/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 600 Pro leads (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro leads (83/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (91/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (83/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Honor 600 Pro | Motorola Frontier 22 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3042805 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.6" OLED LTPS | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2600x1200 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 50W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 60 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Weight | 190 g | — | |
| Launch price | $549 | — |
Honor 600 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Frontier 22
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 60MP
Honor 600 Pro
- 6.6" OLED LTPS
- Resolution: 2600x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Frontier 22
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor 600 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:25 hrs, total 29:53 hrs
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Motorola Frontier 22
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Honor 600 Pro and Motorola Frontier 22, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 600 Pro leads Motorola Frontier 22 by 135.7% in our overall performance rating.
Motorola Frontier 22
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (91/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Frontier 22 is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 600 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Frontier 22 (83/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Honor 600 Pro or the Motorola Frontier 22?
The Honor 600 Pro is noticeably better than the Motorola Frontier 22 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 600 Pro and the Motorola Frontier 22?
The Honor 600 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Motorola Frontier 22 — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor 600 Pro or the Motorola Frontier 22?
The Honor 600 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Honor 600 Pro over the Motorola Frontier 22?
The Honor 600 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Frontier 22 is a better fit for active users.