Honor 500 Pro (China) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

The Honor 500 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 500 Pro (China) leads — 84/100 vs 54/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 500 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the Honor 500 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,425,446); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (184g vs 201g).

The Honor 500 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 500 Pro (China)
Performance 92
Display 85
Camera 78
Battery 86
Portability 60
Value for money
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Performance 71
Display 91
Camera 23
Battery 26
Portability 80
Value for money
What makes Honor 500 Pro (China) better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1425446
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 3800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 5W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 23/100)
  • Longer battery life (86/100 vs 26/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 184g vs 201g

  • Better display (91/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (80/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 500 Pro (China) vs the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, the Honor 500 Pro (China) scores 30 points higher (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) leads (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) leads (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) leads (86/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (92/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (86/100 vs 26/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (80/100 vs 60/100).

Honor 500 Pro (China): The Honor 500 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor 500 Pro (China) Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
AnTuTu 3119308 1425446
Geekbench Single 3041 1761
Geekbench Multi 9494 4688
Display 6.5" AMOLED 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1264x2736 1080x2640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 3800 mAh
Charging 80W 30W
Wireless charging 50W 5W
Main camera 200 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16, MagicOS 10 Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits 1400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 155.8×74.2×7.8 mm 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm
Weight 201 g 184 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Honor 500 Pro (China)
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
78
camera
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
23
camera
Display comparison
Honor 500 Pro (China)
  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2736
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
91
display
Battery and charging
Honor 500 Pro (China)
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
86
battery
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 3800 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
26
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor 500 Pro (China) and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 500 Pro (China) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100
3119308 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
54/100 -118.8%
1425446 AnTuTu

Honor 500 Pro (China) leads Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 118.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (92/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (78/100 vs 23/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor 500 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (86/100 vs 26/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 500 Pro (China) (80/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Honor 500 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra by 30 points (84/100 vs 54/100).

What is the rating of the Honor 500 Pro (China) and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Honor 500 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Honor 500 Pro (China) leads on camera score (78/100 vs 23/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 500 Pro (China) or the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Honor 500 Pro (China) leads on performance (92/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Honor 500 Pro (China) over the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?

The Honor 500 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users.