Honor 400 Smart 4G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Honor 400 Smart 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 43/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 400 Smart 4G has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 476,175); the Honor 400 Smart 4G is noticeably lighter (208g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Honor 400 Smart 4G better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 208g vs 226g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 476175
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1396
- Faster charging: 90W vs 35W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 34/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Smart 4G vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 46 points higher (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (97/100 vs 34/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (93/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart 4G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Smart 4G and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Honor 400 Smart 4G by 87.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (97/100 vs 34/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (93/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (80/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart 4G over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.