Honor 400 Smart 4G vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Honor 400 Smart 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. Both devices score the same overall rating of 33/100. Key differences: the Honor 400 Smart 4G has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor 400 Smart 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 208g).
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 35W
- Lighter: 175g vs 208g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 40/100)
The Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 33/100. In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Honor 400 Smart 4G are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (81/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart 4G | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Honor 400 Smart 4G are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (81/100 vs 40/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
Both devices scored 33/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 33/100.
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart 4G over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.