Honor 400 Smart 4G vs Honor X8c
The Honor 400 Smart 4G (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Honor X8c (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X8c leads — 49/100 vs 42/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 400 Smart 4G has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Honor 400 Smart 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Honor X8c doesn't; the Honor X8c is noticeably lighter (174g vs 208g).
Honor 400 Smart 4G
Honor X8c
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
- Lighter: 174g vs 208g
- Better camera (51/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Honor 400 Smart 4G vs the Honor X8c, the Honor X8c scores 7 points higher (49/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X8c leads (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 33/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X8c notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X8c is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X8c significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (84/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Honor 400 Smart 4G | Honor X8c | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | 467392 | 467392 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1610 | 1080x2412 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 35W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | 2800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.2 mm | 161.1×74.6×7.1 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 174 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X8c
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 720x1610
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X8c
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 400 Smart 4G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Honor X8c
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 400 Smart 4G and Honor X8c, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 33/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X8c notably outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (80/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X8c is a bit better (51/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Smart 4G is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X8c significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Smart 4G (84/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Honor X8c?
The Honor X8c edges out the Honor 400 Smart 4G by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Smart 4G and the Honor X8c?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Honor X8c — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Smart 4G or the Honor X8c?
The Honor X8c leads on camera score (51/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Smart 4G over the Honor X8c?
The Honor 400 Smart 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Honor X8c is a better fit for everyday use.