Honor 400 Pro vs Poco F7
The Honor 400 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $460 and $399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 400 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 66/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 400 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,243,804 vs 2,199,079).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Pro
Poco F7
What makes Honor 400 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2243804 vs 2199079
- Better Geekbench Single: 2203 vs 2072
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 215g
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 80/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Poco F7 better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6649 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $460
- Overall rating 66/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 400 Pro vs the Poco F7, the Honor 400 Pro scores 14 points higher (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Pro leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Pro leads (83/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Honor 400 Pro — 84/100, Poco F7 — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 400 Pro | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 2243804 | 2199079 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 2072 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 6649 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.8×76.1×8.1 mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $460 | $399 |
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Honor 400 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:11 hrs, total 24:36 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 400 Pro and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 400 Pro leads Poco F7 by 2.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $61. Poco F7 was $61 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Pro and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 400 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (78/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F7 (83/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Pro or the Poco F7?
The Honor 400 Pro is noticeably better than the Poco F7 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 400 Pro and the Poco F7?
The Honor 400 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Pro or the Poco F7?
The Honor 400 Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Honor 400 Pro over the Poco F7?
The Honor 400 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.