Honor 200 vs Poco F7 Pro
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $399 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 65/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5200); the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,301,212 vs 1,002,480); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 220g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200
Poco F7 Pro
What makes Honor 200 better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 220g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $499
- Better portability (70/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2301212 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3111
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (67/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 15 points higher (80/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Honor 200 — 58/100, Poco F7 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (87/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (70/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $499 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Pro leads Honor 200 by 56.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Honor 200 was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (87/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (67/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 (87/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (70/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is noticeably better than the Honor 200 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on performance (87/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.