Honor 200 Smart vs Nokia C31
The Honor 200 Smart (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Nokia C31 (2022) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Smart leads — 28/100 vs 10/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 Smart has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5050); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP.
Honor 200 Smart
Nokia C31
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5050 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 191g vs 200g
- Better camera (7/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 10/100
Comparing the Honor 200 Smart vs the Nokia C31, the Honor 200 Smart scores 18 points higher (28/100 vs 10/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Smart leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Smart significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (7/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Smart significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Smart | Nokia C31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 560863 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 923 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2249 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" TFT LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5050 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 55 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 850 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.9×76.8×8.1 mm | — | |
| Weight | 191 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $214 | — |
Honor 200 Smart
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Nokia C31
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Honor 200 Smart
- 6.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C31
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 200 Smart
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C31
- 5050 mAh
- No wireless charging
Nokia C31
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Smart significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (7/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Smart is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Smart significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Smart or the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Smart is noticeably better than the Nokia C31 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Smart and the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Smart has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Nokia C31 — 10/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Smart or the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Smart leads on camera score (7/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Smart over the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Smart is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use.