Honor 200 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $700 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 75/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,801,694); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 137); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Performance 75
Display 85
Camera 70
Battery 79
Portability 57
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 230g
  • Cheaper: $700 vs $950

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1801694
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1930
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4817
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 16 points higher (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Honor 200 Pro: The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor 200 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1801694 4247433
Geekbench Single 1930 3640
Geekbench Multi 4817 11033
Display 6.8" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W
Wireless charging 66W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 137 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP69
Dimensions 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g 230 g
Price $700 $950
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
  • Main: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
70
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
  • 6.8" OLED
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wireless: 66W
79
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor 200 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
75/100
1801694 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +57.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 57.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Honor 200 Pro
$700
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Price difference: $250. Honor 200 Pro is cheaper by $250.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (99/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Honor 200 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Honor 200 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.