Honor 200 Lite vs Nokia G42
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Nokia G42 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Lite leads — 45/100 vs 39/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G42 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor 200 Lite is faster in AnTuTu (567,996 vs 477,542); the Honor 200 Lite is noticeably lighter (166g vs 193g).
Honor 200 Lite
Nokia G42
- Higher AnTuTu: 567996 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 750 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2020 vs 1816
- Faster charging: 35W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 166g vs 193g
- Higher performance (44/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (31/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (68/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (92/100 vs 57/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Nokia G42, the Honor 200 Lite scores 6 points higher (45/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor 200 Lite and the Nokia G42 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia G42 (68/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite and the Nokia G42 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia G42 is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (92/100 vs 57/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Nokia G42 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 567996 | 477542 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 1816 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 20W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 560 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | 165.0×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 193 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia G42
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G42
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Nokia G42
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 200 Lite and Nokia G42, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor 200 Lite leads Nokia G42 by 18.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor 200 Lite and the Nokia G42 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Lite notably outperforms the Nokia G42 (68/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite and the Nokia G42 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia G42 is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia G42 (92/100 vs 57/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Nokia G42?
The Honor 200 Lite edges out the Nokia G42 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Nokia G42?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Nokia G42 — 39/100.
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Nokia G42?
The Honor 200 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia G42 is a better fit for everyday use.