Honor 200 Lite vs Nokia C31
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Nokia C31 (2022) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Lite leads — 27/100 vs 10/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia C31 has the bigger battery (5050 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor 200 Lite has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C31 doesn't; the Honor 200 Lite is noticeably lighter (166g vs 200g).
Honor 200 Lite
Nokia C31
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 166g vs 200g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (92/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5050 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Nokia C31, the Honor 200 Lite scores 17 points higher (27/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite leads (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C31 leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (31/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia C31 is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (92/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Nokia C31 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5050 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 12 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 166 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $206 | — |
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Nokia C31
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C31
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C31
- 5050 mAh
- No wireless charging
Nokia C31
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (31/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia C31 is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (92/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Lite is noticeably better than the Nokia C31 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Nokia C31 — 10/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Lite or the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Lite leads on camera score (31/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Nokia C31?
The Honor 200 Lite is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use.