Google Pixel Fold vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

The Google Pixel Fold (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 65/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel Fold has the bigger battery (4821 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,186,373); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 283g).

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel Fold — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel Fold

Performance 65
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 60
Portability 52
Value for money 38

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 62

What makes Google Pixel Fold better?

  • Bigger battery: 4821 vs 4700 mAh

  • Better camera (67/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (60/100 vs 58/100)

What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1186373
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1461
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3867
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 283g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 52/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel Fold vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 11 points higher (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel Fold leads (67/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Google Pixel Fold — 38/100, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel Fold and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).

Google Pixel Fold: The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel Fold Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G2 Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1186373 2962094
Geekbench Single 1461 3013
Geekbench Multi 3867 9287
Display 7.6" Foldable OLED 7.0" pOLED
Resolution 1840x2208 1224x2912
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 4821 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging — 68W
Wireless charging — 30W
DXOMark (camera) 133 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1450 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP48
Dimensions 139.7×158.7×5.8 mm 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm
Weight 283 g 199 g
Launch price $1799 $1099

Camera comparison

Google Pixel Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 8MP
67
camera

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel Fold

  • 7.6" Foldable OLED
  • Resolution: 1840x2208
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel Fold

  • 4821 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
60
battery

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel Fold and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel Fold Google Tensor G2
65/100
1186373 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100 +59.9%
2962094 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Google Pixel Fold by 59.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel Fold

$1799

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

$1099

Launch price difference: $700. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (91/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel Fold is a bit better (67/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel Fold and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (60/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (68/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel Fold or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel Fold — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel Fold and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Google Pixel Fold has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel Fold or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Google Pixel Fold leads on camera score (67/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel Fold or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel Fold over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?

The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.