Google Pixel 9a vs Realme GT 8 Pro

The Google Pixel 9a (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Realme GT 8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 66/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Realme GT 8 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme GT 8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,321,069); the Google Pixel 9a is noticeably lighter (186g vs 218g).

The Realme GT 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a by 24 points (90/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9a

Performance 71
Display 82
Camera 63
Battery 52
Portability 58
Value for money 54

Realme GT 8 Pro

Performance 98
Display 98
Camera 84
Battery 91
Portability 46
Value for money 94

What makes Google Pixel 9a better?

  • Lighter: 186g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $599

  • Better portability (58/100 vs 46/100)

What makes Realme GT 8 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1321069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1977
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4778
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 23W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (84/100 vs 63/100)
  • Longer battery life (91/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (98/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9a vs the Realme GT 8 Pro, the Realme GT 8 Pro scores 24 points higher (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads (98/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro leads (91/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9a — 54/100, Realme GT 8 Pro — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (98/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (98/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9a is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100).

Google Pixel 9a: The Google Pixel 9a is a better fit for active users.
Realme GT 8 Pro: The Realme GT 8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9a Realme GT 8 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1321069 3950082
Geekbench Single 1977 3639
Geekbench Multi 4778 11047
Display 6.3" P-OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2424x1080 1440x3136
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5100 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 23W 120W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 128 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 realme UI 7.0
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 7000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 154.7×73.3×8.9 mm 161.8×76.9×8.2 mm
Weight 186 g 218 g
Launch price $499 $599

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9a

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
63
camera

Realme GT 8 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
84
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9a

  • 6.3" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 2424x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Realme GT 8 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3136
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
98
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9a

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 23W
  • Wireless: 7W
52
battery

Realme GT 8 Pro

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
91
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9a and Realme GT 8 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4
66/100
1321069 AnTuTu
Realme GT 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
90/100 +66.6%
3950082 AnTuTu

Realme GT 8 Pro leads Google Pixel 9a by 66.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9a

$499

Realme GT 8 Pro

$599

Launch price difference: $100. Google Pixel 9a was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (98/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (98/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (84/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a (91/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9a is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9a or the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Realme GT 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9a by 24 points (90/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9a and the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9a has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Realme GT 8 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9a or the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Realme GT 8 Pro leads on camera score (84/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9a or the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Realme GT 8 Pro leads on performance (98/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9a over the Realme GT 8 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9a is a better fit for active users. The Realme GT 8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.