Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Samsung Galaxy M17e
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $1099 and $140. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads — 74/100 vs 43/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17e has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5060); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is faster in AnTuTu (1,585,585 vs 524,785); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M17e is noticeably lighter (199g vs 221g).
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Higher AnTuTu: 1585585 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 1900 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5200 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 37W vs 25W
- Higher performance (74/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (88/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (57/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (86/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5060 mAh
- Lighter: 199g vs 221g
- Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $1099
- Better portability (57/100 vs 41/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Samsung Galaxy M17e, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL scores 31 points higher (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (88/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (57/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro XL | Samsung Galaxy M17e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 1585585 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1900 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5200 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2992x1344 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5060 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 37W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 23W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 160 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 221 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $140 |
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 42MP
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2992x1344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
- 5060 mAh
- Wired: 37W
- Wireless: 23W
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy M17e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 202.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $959. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $959 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (74/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (86/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (88/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (57/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (57/100 vs 41/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 31 points (74/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17e — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on performance (74/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use.