Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Samsung Galaxy A26

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380; estimated prices are $1099 and $182. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads — 53/100 vs 32/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5060 mAh vs 5000); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is faster in AnTuTu (1,585,585 vs 749,719); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 221g).

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 21 points (53/100 vs 32/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Performance 26
Display 100
Camera 88
Battery 46
Design 23
Value for money 34
Samsung Galaxy A26
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 29
Battery 37
Design 50
Value for money 97
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1585585 vs 749719
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1900 vs 1008
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 5200 vs 2758
  • Bigger battery: 5060 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 37W vs 25W

  • Higher performance (26/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (88/100 vs 29/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?
  • Lighter: 200g vs 221g
  • Cheaper: $182 vs $1099

  • Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 23/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Samsung Galaxy A26, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL scores 21 points higher (53/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 29/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 leads (97/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (88/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (50/100 vs 23/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (97/100 vs 34/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.
Samsung Galaxy A26: The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Samsung Galaxy A26
Processor Google Tensor G4 Exynos 1380
AnTuTu 1585585 749719
Geekbench Single 1900 1008
Geekbench Multi 5200 2758
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 37W 25W
Wireless charging 23W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 160
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP67
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm
Weight 221 g 200 g
Price $1099 $182
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera
Samsung Galaxy A26
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
29
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy A26
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
46
battery
Samsung Galaxy A26
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Samsung Galaxy A26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
53/100
1585585 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A26 Exynos 1380
32/100 -111.5%
749719 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 111.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
$1099
Samsung Galaxy A26
$182

Price difference: $917. Samsung Galaxy A26 is cheaper by $917.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (26/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (88/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (50/100 vs 23/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (97/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 21 points (53/100 vs 32/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Samsung Galaxy A26 — 32/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 29/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on performance (26/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Samsung Galaxy A26?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy A26 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.