Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Nothing Phone (4a)

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; launch prices were $1099 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads — 74/100 vs 62/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (4a) has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5060); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is faster in AnTuTu (1,672,795 vs 1,039,119); the Nothing Phone (4a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 221g).

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (4a) — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 58

Nothing Phone (4a)

Performance 60
Display 80
Camera 61
Battery 53
Portability 59
Value for money 58

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1672795 vs 1039119
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1900 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 5200 vs 3168

  • Higher performance (74/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (88/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (57/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (86/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Nothing Phone (4a) better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5060 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 37W
  • Lighter: 190g vs 221g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $1099

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Nothing Phone (4a), the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL scores 12 points higher (74/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (74/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — 58/100, Nothing Phone (4a) — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (86/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (88/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Nothing Phone (4a) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (59/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Nothing Phone (4a): The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Nothing Phone (4a)
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
AnTuTu 1672795 1039119
Geekbench Single 1900 1223
Geekbench Multi 5200 3168
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 2412x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 37W 45W
Wireless charging 23W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 160 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm
Weight 221 g 190 g
Launch price $1099 $349

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Nothing Phone (4a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1672795 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
62/100 -61.0%
1039119 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads Nothing Phone (4a) by 61.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

$1099

Nothing Phone (4a)

$349

Launch price difference: $750. Nothing Phone (4a) was $750 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (86/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (88/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Nothing Phone (4a) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (59/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (4a) — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Nothing Phone (4a) — 62/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on performance (74/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users.