Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Redmi K100 Pro Max

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Redmi K100 Pro Max (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $730. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads — 94/100 vs 64/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K100 Pro Max has the bigger battery (9070 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Redmi K100 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,401,321).

The Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 30 points (94/100 vs 64/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 32
Redmi K100 Pro Max
Performance 98
Display 91
Camera 90
Battery 95
Portability
Value for money 100
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?

  • Overall rating 64/100
What makes Redmi K100 Pro Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1401321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4516
  • Bigger battery: 9070 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
  • Cheaper at launch: $730 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (95/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Redmi K100 Pro Max, the Redmi K100 Pro Max scores 30 points higher (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max leads (95/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 32/100, Redmi K100 Pro Max — 100/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (98/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 42/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Redmi K100 Pro Max: The Redmi K100 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Redmi K100 Pro Max
Processor Google Tensor G4 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1401321 3942923
Geekbench Single 1750 3640
Geekbench Multi 4516 11033
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.9" AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 185 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 9070 mAh
Charging 21W 100W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 129
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP69
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm
Weight 257 g
Launch price $1799 $730
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera
Redmi K100 Pro Max
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Redmi K100 Pro Max
  • 6.9" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery
Redmi K100 Pro Max
  • 9070 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
95
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Redmi K100 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Redmi K100 Pro Max Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
94/100 +64.5%
3942923 AnTuTu

Redmi K100 Pro Max leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 64.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
$1799
Redmi K100 Pro Max
$730

Launch price difference: $1069. Redmi K100 Pro Max was $1069 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (98/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max is a bit better (91/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Redmi K100 Pro Max?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 30 points (94/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Redmi K100 Pro Max?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Redmi K100 Pro Max — 94/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Redmi K100 Pro Max?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max leads on camera score (90/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Redmi K100 Pro Max?

The Redmi K100 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Redmi K100 Pro Max?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Redmi K100 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.