Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Huawei Pura 90s Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Huawei Pura 90s Pro (2026) runs on the HiSilicon Kirin 9030S; launch prices were $1799 and $980. By overall MobileRank rating, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro leads — 66/100 vs 64/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Huawei Pura 90s Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,401,321 vs 1,273,046); the Huawei Pura 90s Pro is noticeably lighter (213g vs 257g).

The Huawei Pura 90s Pro edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Huawei Pura 90s Pro

Performance 64
Display 85
Camera 57
Battery 75
Portability 49
Value for money 44

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1401321 vs 1273046
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1707 vs 1273
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4431 vs 3894

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (64/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 49/100)

What makes Huawei Pura 90s Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 66W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
  • Lighter: 213g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $980 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Huawei Pura 90s Pro, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro scores 2 points higher (66/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro leads (75/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Huawei Pura 90s Pro — 44/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (70/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (75/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Huawei Pura 90s Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Huawei Pura 90s Pro: The Huawei Pura 90s Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Huawei Pura 90s Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 HiSilicon Kirin 9030S
AnTuTu 1401321 1273046
Geekbench Single 1707 1273
Geekbench Multi 4431 3894
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.6" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2076x2152 1256x2760
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 21W 66W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 13 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16, EMUI 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 157.8×74.5×8.2 mm
Weight 257 g 213 g
Launch price $1799 $980

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Huawei Pura 90s Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
57
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Huawei Pura 90s Pro

  • 6.6" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1256x2760
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Huawei Pura 90s Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • Wireless: 50W
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Huawei Pura 90s Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Huawei Pura 90s Pro HiSilicon Kirin 9030S
66/100 -10.1%
1273046 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads Huawei Pura 90s Pro by 10.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Huawei Pura 90s Pro

$980

Launch price difference: $819. Huawei Pura 90s Pro was $819 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (70/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (75/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Huawei Pura 90s Pro are nearly equal (52/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Huawei Pura 90s Pro?

The Huawei Pura 90s Pro edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Huawei Pura 90s Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Huawei Pura 90s Pro — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Huawei Pura 90s Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on camera score (64/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Huawei Pura 90s Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on performance (70/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Huawei Pura 90s Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Huawei Pura 90s Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.