Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Honor Magic9 Super
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 64/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 1,401,321); the Honor Magic9 Super is noticeably lighter (227g vs 257g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Honor Magic9 Super
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
- Better portability (52/100 vs 41/100)
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1707
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4431
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
- Lighter: 227g vs 257g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Honor Magic9 Super, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 23 points higher (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Honor Magic9 Super | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 4290399 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1707 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4431 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 1280x2788 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 11000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 10000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Honor Magic9 Super, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 67.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super is a bit better (78/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (91/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Honor Magic9 Super?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 23 points (87/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Honor Magic9 Super?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Honor Magic9 Super — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Honor Magic9 Super?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Honor Magic9 Super?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Honor Magic9 Super?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.