Google Pixel 8a vs Nubia NaviX Ultra

The Google Pixel 8a (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Nubia NaviX Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $845. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia NaviX Ultra leads — 92/100 vs 65/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia NaviX Ultra has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4492); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Nubia NaviX Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,433,693); the Google Pixel 8a is noticeably lighter (188g vs 208g).

The Nubia NaviX Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 27 points (92/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 8a

Performance 70
Display 82
Camera 70
Battery 39
Portability 57
Value for money 52

Nubia NaviX Ultra

Performance 98
Display 94
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 59
Value for money 98

What makes Google Pixel 8a better?

  • Lighter: 188g vs 208g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $845

  • Overall rating 65/100

What makes Nubia NaviX Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1433693
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1722
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4458
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4492 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 57/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8a vs the Nubia NaviX Ultra, the Nubia NaviX Ultra scores 27 points higher (92/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra leads (98/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra leads (85/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8a — 52/100, Nubia NaviX Ultra — 98/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (98/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (59/100 vs 57/100).

Google Pixel 8a: The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users.
Nubia NaviX Ultra: The Nubia NaviX Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 8a Nubia NaviX Ultra
Processor Google Tensor G3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1433693 3950082
Geekbench Single 1722 3639
Geekbench Multi 4458 11047
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4492 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 136 —
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 —
Dimensions 152.1×72.7×8.9 mm 162.1×75.7×7.6 mm
Weight 188 g 208 g
Launch price $499 $845

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 8a

  • Main: 64MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
70
camera

Nubia NaviX Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 8a

  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Nubia NaviX Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 8a

  • 4492 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
39
battery

Nubia NaviX Ultra

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8a and Nubia NaviX Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3
65/100
1433693 AnTuTu
Nubia NaviX Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
92/100 +63.7%
3950082 AnTuTu

Nubia NaviX Ultra leads Google Pixel 8a by 63.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 8a

$499

Nubia NaviX Ultra

$845

Launch price difference: $346. Google Pixel 8a was $346 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (98/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (96/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a (85/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nubia NaviX Ultra and the Google Pixel 8a are nearly equal (59/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 8a or the Nubia NaviX Ultra?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 8a by 27 points (92/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8a and the Nubia NaviX Ultra?

The Google Pixel 8a has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Nubia NaviX Ultra — 92/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8a or the Nubia NaviX Ultra?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8a or the Nubia NaviX Ultra?

The Nubia NaviX Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8a over the Nubia NaviX Ultra?

The Google Pixel 8a is a better fit for active users. The Nubia NaviX Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.