Google Pixel 8 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 8 Pro (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 72/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5050); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,367,231); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 153).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Performance 70
Display 87
Camera 83
Battery 56
Portability 42
Value for money 56
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel 8 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 213g vs 226g

  • Better display (87/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1367231
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4500
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5050 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 23W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 83/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 15 points higher (87/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 83/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 83/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Google Pixel 8 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).

Google Pixel 8 Pro: The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 8 Pro Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G3 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1367231 3269794
Geekbench Single 1750 3228
Geekbench Multi 4500 9553
Display 6.7" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5050 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 23W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 153 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2400 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.6×76.5×8.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 213 g 226 g
Launch price $999 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 10MP
83
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • 6.7" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
87
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • 5050 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 23W
56
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8 Pro and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3
72/100
1367231 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +58.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 8 Pro by 58.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 8 Pro
$999
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (93/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 83/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (81/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Google Pixel 8 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 8 Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 83/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8 Pro over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.