Google Pixel 8 Pro vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max

The Google Pixel 8 Pro (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $999 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 8 Pro leads — 72/100 vs 71/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5050); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,728,128 vs 1,367,231).

The Google Pixel 8 Pro edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Performance 70
Display 87
Camera 83
Battery 56
Portability 42
Value for money 56
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Performance 88
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 45
Value for money 84
What makes Google Pixel 8 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 213g vs 219g

  • Better camera (83/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (87/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2728128 vs 1367231
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 4500
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5050 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $999

  • Higher performance (88/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (45/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8 Pro vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Google Pixel 8 Pro scores 1 points higher (72/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro leads (83/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8 Pro — 56/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (88/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (83/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Google Pixel 8 Pro are nearly equal (45/100 vs 42/100).

Google Pixel 8 Pro: The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 8 Pro Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Processor Google Tensor G3 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 1367231 2728128
Geekbench Single 1750 2680
Geekbench Multi 4500 8358
Display 6.7" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5050 mAh 9000 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 23W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 153
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2400 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.6×76.5×8.8 mm 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 213 g 219 g
Launch price $999 $300
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 10MP
83
camera
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • 6.7" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
87
display
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 8 Pro
  • 5050 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 23W
56
battery
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8 Pro and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3
72/100
1367231 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100 +49.9%
2728128 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Google Pixel 8 Pro by 49.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 8 Pro
$999
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
$300

Launch price difference: $699. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $699 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (88/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (83/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (80/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Google Pixel 8 Pro are nearly equal (45/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 Max by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro leads on camera score (83/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (88/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8 Pro over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.