Google Pixel 8 Pro vs Realme Neo7 Turbo

The Google Pixel 8 Pro (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G3, while the Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e; launch prices were $999 and $270. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 8 Pro leads — 72/100 vs 70/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5050); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,560,650 vs 1,367,231).

The Google Pixel 8 Pro edges out the Realme Neo7 Turbo by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Performance 70
Display 87
Camera 83
Battery 56
Portability 42
Value for money 54

Realme Neo7 Turbo

Performance 84
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 85
Portability 50
Value for money 86

What makes Google Pixel 8 Pro better?


  • Better camera (83/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better display (87/100 vs 84/100)

What makes Realme Neo7 Turbo better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2560650 vs 1367231
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2233 vs 1750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 7478 vs 4500
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5050 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 213g
  • Cheaper at launch: $270 vs $999

  • Higher performance (84/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 42/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 8 Pro vs the Realme Neo7 Turbo, the Google Pixel 8 Pro scores 2 points higher (72/100 vs 70/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro leads (83/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (85/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Google Pixel 8 Pro — 54/100, Realme Neo7 Turbo — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (83/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (85/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).

Google Pixel 8 Pro: The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Realme Neo7 Turbo: The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 8 Pro Realme Neo7 Turbo
Processor Google Tensor G3 MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
AnTuTu 1367231 2560650
Geekbench Single 1750 2233
Geekbench Multi 4500 7478
Display 6.7" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1280x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5050 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 23W —
DXOMark (camera) 153 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2400 nits 6500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 162.6×76.5×8.8 mm 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm
Weight 213 g 205 g
Launch price $999 $270

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 8 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 10MP
83
camera

Realme Neo7 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 8 Pro

  • 6.7" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
87
display

Realme Neo7 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 8 Pro

  • 5050 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 23W
56
battery

Realme Neo7 Turbo

  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless charging: no data
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 8 Pro and Realme Neo7 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 8 Pro Google Tensor G3
72/100
1367231 AnTuTu
Realme Neo7 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
70/100 +46.6%
2560650 AnTuTu

Realme Neo7 Turbo leads Google Pixel 8 Pro by 46.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 8 Pro

$999

Realme Neo7 Turbo

$270

Launch price difference: $729. Realme Neo7 Turbo was $729 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Realme Neo7 Turbo (83/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo notably outperforms the Google Pixel 8 Pro (85/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro edges out the Realme Neo7 Turbo by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 8 Pro and the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Realme Neo7 Turbo — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro leads on camera score (83/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 8 Pro or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo leads on performance (84/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 8 Pro over the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.