Google Pixel 7a vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 7a (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $180 and $834. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 60/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4385); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,194,673); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 133); the Google Pixel 7a is noticeably lighter (193g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a by 27 points (87/100 vs 60/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 7a
Performance 64
Display 70
Camera 67
Battery 37
Portability 52
Value for money 88
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel 7a better?
  • Lighter: 193g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $180 vs $834

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better value for money (88/100 vs 86/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1194673
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1459
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3451
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4385 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 67/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 7a vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 27 points higher (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (96/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (81/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 7a is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 7a and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 86/100).

Google Pixel 7a: The Google Pixel 7a is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 7a Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G2 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1194673 3269794
Geekbench Single 1459 3228
Geekbench Multi 3451 9553
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4385 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 7W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 133 171
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 152.0×72.9×9.0 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 193 g 226 g
Price $180 $834
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 7a
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
67
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 7a
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
70
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 7a
  • 4385 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless: 7W
37
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 7a and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2
60/100
1194673 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +63.5%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 7a by 63.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 7a
$180
Vivo X300 Pro
$834

Price difference: $654. Google Pixel 7a is cheaper by $654.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (93/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (96/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (81/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 7a is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 7a and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (88/100 vs 86/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 7a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a by 27 points (87/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 7a and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 7a has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 7a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 7a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 7a over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 7a is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.