Google Pixel 6 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 6 (2021) runs on the Google Tensor, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $599 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 59/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4614); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 990,213); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 126); the Google Pixel 6 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 by 29 points (88/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 6

Performance 62
Display 69
Camera 62
Battery 44
Portability 45
Value for money 32

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Google Pixel 6 better?

  • Lighter: 207g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $899

  • Better portability (45/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 990213
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1477
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3595
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4614 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 21W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 62/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 69/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 6 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 29 points higher (88/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Google Pixel 6 — 32/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (94/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (96/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 6 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).

Google Pixel 6: The Google Pixel 6 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 6 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 990213 3326259
Geekbench Single 1477 3293
Geekbench Multi 3595 10243
Display 6.4" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4614 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 21W 90W
Wireless charging 21W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 126 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.6×74.8×8.9 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 207 g 226 g
Launch price $599 $899

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 6

  • Main: 50MP f/1.85
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 8MP
62
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 6

  • 6.4" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
69
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 6

  • 4614 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 21W
44
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 6 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor
59/100
990213 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +70.2%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 6 by 70.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 6

$599

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $300. Google Pixel 6 was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (94/100 vs 62/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (84/100 vs 69/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (96/100 vs 62/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 (81/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 6 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 6 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 6 by 29 points (88/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 6 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 6 has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 6 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 62/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 6 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 6 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 6 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.