Google Pixel 5a 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 5a 5G (2021) runs on the Snapdragon 765G, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $449 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 38/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4680); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 597,974); the Google Pixel 5a 5G is noticeably lighter (183g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G by 49 points (87/100 vs 38/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 5a 5G
Performance 44
Display 58
Camera 17
Battery 36
Portability 60
Value for money 8
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel 5a 5G better?
  • Lighter: 183g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $899

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 597974
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 799
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1836
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4680 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 17/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 5a 5G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 49 points higher (87/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 36/100). Value score: Google Pixel 5a 5G — 8/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (84/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (96/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 5a 5G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

Google Pixel 5a 5G: The Google Pixel 5a 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 5a 5G Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Snapdragon 765G Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 597974 3269794
Geekbench Single 799 3228
Geekbench Multi 1836 9553
Display 6.3" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1260x2800
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4680 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 16 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 700 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP68
Dimensions 156.2×73.2×8.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 183 g 226 g
Launch price $449 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 5a 5G
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 16MP
  • Front: 8MP
17
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 5a 5G
  • 6.3" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
58
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 5a 5G
  • 4680 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 5a 5G and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 5a 5G Snapdragon 765G
38/100
597974 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +81.7%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 5a 5G by 81.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 5a 5G
$449
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $450. Google Pixel 5a 5G was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (93/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (84/100 vs 58/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (96/100 vs 17/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G (81/100 vs 36/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 5a 5G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 5a 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 5a 5G by 49 points (87/100 vs 38/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 5a 5G and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 5a 5G has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 5a 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 17/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 5a 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 5a 5G over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 5a 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.