Google Pixel 3a XL vs Honor Magic7 Pro

The Google Pixel 3a XL (2019) runs on the Snapdragon 670, while the Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $479 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 85/100 vs 27/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Pro has the bigger battery (5850 mAh vs 3700); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 322,015); the Google Pixel 3a XL is noticeably lighter (167g vs 223g).

The Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL by 58 points (85/100 vs 27/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 3a XL
Performance 26
Display 56
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 76
Value for money 0
Honor Magic7 Pro
Performance 92
Display 84
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 36
Value for money 82
What makes Google Pixel 3a XL better?
  • Lighter: 167g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $479 vs $899

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 36/100)
What makes Honor Magic7 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 322015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 381
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1239
  • Bigger battery: 5850 vs 3700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 26/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 3a XL vs the Honor Magic7 Pro, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 58 points higher (85/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (92/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (82/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Google Pixel 3a XL — 0/100, Honor Magic7 Pro — 82/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (92/100 vs 26/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (82/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a XL significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (76/100 vs 36/100).

Google Pixel 3a XL: The Google Pixel 3a XL is a better fit for everyday use.
Honor Magic7 Pro: The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 3a XL Honor Magic7 Pro
Processor Snapdragon 670 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 322015 3119308
Geekbench Single 381 3041
Geekbench Multi 1239 9494
Display 6.0" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2160 2800x1280
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3700 mAh 5850 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 80W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 Pie Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 160.1×76.1×8.2 mm 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm
Weight 167 g 223 g
Launch price $479 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 3a XL
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Honor Magic7 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 3a XL
  • 6.0" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2160
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
56
display
Honor Magic7 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 3a XL
  • 3700 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
15
battery
Honor Magic7 Pro
  • 5850 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 80W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 3a XL and Honor Magic7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 3a XL Snapdragon 670
27/100
322015 AnTuTu
Honor Magic7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
85/100 +89.7%
3119308 AnTuTu

Honor Magic7 Pro leads Google Pixel 3a XL by 89.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 3a XL
$479
Honor Magic7 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $420. Google Pixel 3a XL was $420 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (92/100 vs 26/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (84/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (87/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL (82/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 3a XL significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (76/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 3a XL or the Honor Magic7 Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 3a XL by 58 points (85/100 vs 27/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 3a XL and the Honor Magic7 Pro?

The Google Pixel 3a XL has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Honor Magic7 Pro — 85/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 3a XL or the Honor Magic7 Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 3a XL or the Honor Magic7 Pro?

The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 26/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 3a XL over the Honor Magic7 Pro?

The Google Pixel 3a XL is a better fit for everyday use. The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.