Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (2026) runs on the Tensor G6, while the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads — 76/100 vs 63/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4806); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,951,408 vs 1,797,821); the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is thinner (5.0mm vs 9.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
What makes Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1951408 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 2755 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 7563 vs 5179
- Higher performance (83/100 vs 75/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 27/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R9 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4806 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 229g vs 239g
- Better camera (81/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro scores 13 points higher (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads (81/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads (66/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bit better (83/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (66/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (52/100 vs 27/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Sharp Aquos R9 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Tensor G6 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1951408 | 1797821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2755 | 1923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7563 | 5179 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable OLED | 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 1440x3120 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 4806 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.4×5.0 mm | 162.0×78.0×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 239 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- 8.0" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 6.7" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1440x3120
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold
- 4806 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Sharp Aquos R9 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and Sharp Aquos R9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold leads Sharp Aquos R9 Pro by 8.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a bit better (83/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold (66/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro (52/100 vs 27/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold and the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold or the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold leads on performance (83/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold over the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro?
The Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.