Google Pixel 10a vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 10a (2026) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $449 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 66/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,400,792); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 134); the Google Pixel 10a is noticeably lighter (185g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10a by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10a
Performance 75
Display 69
Camera 68
Battery 46
Portability 57
Value for money 64
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel 10a better?
  • Lighter: 185g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $899

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1400792
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2305
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6054
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 10W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 68/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 69/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10a vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 21 points higher (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10a — 64/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (96/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10a is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).

Google Pixel 10a: The Google Pixel 10a is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10a Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G5 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1400792 3269794
Geekbench Single 2305 3228
Geekbench Multi 6054 9553
Display 6.3" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 10W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 134 171
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 153.9×73.0×9.0 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 185 g 226 g
Launch price $449 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10a
  • Main: 64MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
68
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10a
  • 6.3" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
69
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10a
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 10W
46
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10a and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G5
66/100
1400792 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +57.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 10a by 57.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Google Pixel 10a
$449
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $450. Google Pixel 10a was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (93/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (84/100 vs 69/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (96/100 vs 68/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (81/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10a is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10a by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10a and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10a has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 68/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10a or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10a over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10a is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.