Google Pixel 10a vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max

The Google Pixel 10a (2026) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $449 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 64/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 1,422,477); the Google Pixel 10a is noticeably lighter (185g vs 219g).

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max edges out the Google Pixel 10a by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 10a

Performance 70
Display 69
Camera 68
Battery 44
Portability 57
Value for money 52

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 45
Value for money 80

What makes Google Pixel 10a better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 185g vs 219g

  • Better camera (68/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (57/100 vs 45/100)

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 1422477
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 1707
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 4431
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 23W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $449

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 69/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10a vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 7 points higher (71/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10a leads (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Google Pixel 10a — 52/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10a significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10a is a bit better (57/100 vs 45/100).

Google Pixel 10a: The Google Pixel 10a is a better fit for active users.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 10a Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
AnTuTu 1422477 2726802
Geekbench Single 1707 2725
Geekbench Multi 4431 8932
Display 6.3" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 2772x1280
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 9000 mAh
Charging 23W 100W
Wireless charging 10W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 134 —
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 8 MP
Front camera 13 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 153.9×73.0×9.0 mm 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 185 g 219 g
Launch price $449 $300

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 10a

  • Main: 64MP f/1.89
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
68
camera

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 10a

  • 6.3" OLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
69
display

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 10a

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 23W
  • Wireless: 10W
44
battery

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10a and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4
64/100
1422477 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100 +47.8%
2726802 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Google Pixel 10a by 47.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 10a

$449

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

$300

Launch price difference: $149. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $149 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (89/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (84/100 vs 69/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10a significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (68/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10a (80/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10a is a bit better (57/100 vs 45/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 10a or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max edges out the Google Pixel 10a by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10a and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 10a has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10a or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 10a leads on camera score (68/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10a or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10a over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?

The Google Pixel 10a is a better fit for active users. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.