Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads — 76/100 vs 59/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is faster in AnTuTu (1,617,706 vs 1,135,878); the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is thinner (8.5mm vs 9.9mm).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

Performance 77
Display 86
Camera 90
Battery 62
Portability 35
Value for money 62

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

Performance 64
Display 89
Camera 46
Battery 54
Portability 32
Value for money —

What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro XL better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1617706 vs 1135878
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2296 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6203 vs 3537
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4500 mAh

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 46/100)
  • Longer battery life (62/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better portability (35/100 vs 32/100)

What makes Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 39W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 220g vs 232g

  • Better display (89/100 vs 86/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL scores 17 points higher (76/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (77/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (77/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (89/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (62/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS: The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS
Processor Google Tensor G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G
AnTuTu 1617706 1135878
Geekbench Single 2296 1500
Geekbench Multi 6203 3537
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 39W 120W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 163 —
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 5 MP
Front camera 42 MP 20 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 12, Joy UI 12.8
Brightness (peak) 3300 nits 1300 nits
NFC — yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 163.7×76.2×9.9 mm
Weight 232 g 220 g
Launch price $1199 —

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
90
camera

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 5MP
  • Front: 20MP
46
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 39W
  • Wireless: 25W
62
battery

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
54
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Google Tensor G5
76/100
1617706 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS Qualcomm Snapdragon 888/888+ 5G
59/100 -42.4%
1135878 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS by 42.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

$1199

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (77/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS and the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL are nearly equal (89/100 vs 86/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS (90/100 vs 46/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a bit better (62/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is noticeably better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS — 59/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on camera score (90/100 vs 46/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on performance (77/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 RS is a better fit for active users.