Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Poco F8 Pro

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Poco F8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1199 and $529. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 56/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Pro has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,033,306 vs 1,617,706); the Poco F8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 232g).

The Poco F8 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
Performance 33
Display 100
Camera 90
Battery 51
Design 10
Value for money 27
Poco F8 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 68
Battery 66
Design 51
Value for money 73
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro XL better?

  • Better camera (90/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Poco F8 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3033306 vs 1617706
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 2296
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 6203
  • Bigger battery: 6210 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 39W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 199g vs 232g
  • Cheaper: $529 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better value for money (73/100 vs 27/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs the Poco F8 Pro, the Poco F8 Pro scores 15 points higher (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (68/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (73/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (68/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (73/100 vs 27/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.
Poco F8 Pro: The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Poco F8 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1617706 3033306
Geekbench Single 2296 3050
Geekbench Multi 6203 9300
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6210 mAh
Charging 39W 100W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 163
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 20 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm
Weight 232 g 199 g
Price $1199 $529
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
90
camera
Poco F8 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
68
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Poco F8 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 39W
  • Wireless: 25W
51
battery
Poco F8 Pro
  • 6210 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:55 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and Poco F8 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL Google Tensor G5
56/100
1617706 AnTuTu
Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +46.7%
3033306 AnTuTu

Poco F8 Pro leads Google Pixel 10 Pro XL by 46.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 10 Pro XL
$1199
Poco F8 Pro
$529

Price difference: $670. Poco F8 Pro is cheaper by $670.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (68/100 vs 33/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (90/100 vs 68/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (66/100 vs 51/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (51/100 vs 10/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL (73/100 vs 27/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Poco F8 Pro?

The Poco F8 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL and the Poco F8 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Poco F8 Pro — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Poco F8 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL leads on camera score (90/100 vs 68/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL or the Poco F8 Pro?

The Poco F8 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 33/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL over the Poco F8 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro XL is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for active users.