Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs ZTE Blade V50 Vita

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (2023) runs on the Unisoc T606; estimated prices are $1799 and $210. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads — 38/100 vs 25/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade V50 Vita has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,553,009 vs 330,006); the ZTE Blade V50 Vita is noticeably lighter (204g vs 258g).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade V50 Vita — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Performance 32
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 42
Design 0
Value for money 0
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 24
Battery 42
Design 45
Value for money 95
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1553009 vs 330006
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6173 vs 1335
  • Faster charging: 30W vs 18W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (32/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (31/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
What makes ZTE Blade V50 Vita better?
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5015 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 204g vs 258g
  • Cheaper: $210 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (45/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (95/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the ZTE Blade V50 Vita, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold scores 13 points higher (38/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita leads (95/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100. In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
ZTE Blade V50 Vita: The ZTE Blade V50 Vita is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold ZTE Blade V50 Vita
Processor Google Tensor G5 Unisoc T606
AnTuTu 1553009 330006
Geekbench Single 2276 378
Geekbench Multi 6173 1335
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 2152x2076 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 30W 18W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 8 MP
RAM 16GB 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm 167.4×76.0×8.3 mm
Weight 258 g 204 g
Price $1799 $210
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
31
camera
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and ZTE Blade V50 Vita, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
38/100
1553009 AnTuTu
ZTE Blade V50 Vita Unisoc T606
25/100 -370.6%
330006 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads ZTE Blade V50 Vita by 370.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
$1799
ZTE Blade V50 Vita
$210

Price difference: $1589. ZTE Blade V50 Vita is cheaper by $1589.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (32/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 Vita (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 42/100.

design

In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (45/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (95/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade V50 Vita — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the ZTE Blade V50 Vita — 25/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on camera score (31/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on performance (32/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the ZTE Blade V50 Vita?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V50 Vita is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.