Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Vivo Y51 Pro

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Vivo Y51 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo; estimated prices are $1799 and $230. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads — 38/100 vs 33/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y51 Pro has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is faster in AnTuTu (1,553,009 vs 877,641); the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y51 Pro doesn't; the Vivo Y51 Pro is noticeably lighter (219g vs 258g).

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold edges out the Vivo Y51 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Performance 32
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 42
Design 0
Value for money 0
Vivo Y51 Pro
Performance 2
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 57
Design 26
Value for money 94
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1553009 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6173 vs 2813

  • Higher performance (32/100 vs 2/100)
  • Better camera (31/100 vs 24/100)
What makes Vivo Y51 Pro better?
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5015 mAh
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 219g vs 258g
  • Cheaper: $230 vs $1799

  • Longer battery life (57/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (26/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (94/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Vivo Y51 Pro, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold scores 5 points higher (38/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads (32/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro leads (57/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro leads (94/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y51 Pro (32/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (57/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (26/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 0/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo Y51 Pro: The Vivo Y51 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Vivo Y51 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G5 MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo
AnTuTu 1553009 877641
Geekbench Single 2276 1011
Geekbench Multi 6173 2813
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 2152x2076 720x1570
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 30W 44W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 8 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 1250 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm
Weight 258 g 219 g
Price $1799 $230
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
31
camera
Vivo Y51 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/2.0
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y51 Pro
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1570
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
Vivo Y51 Pro
  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Vivo Y51 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
38/100
1553009 AnTuTu
Vivo Y51 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7360 Turbo
33/100 -77.0%
877641 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads Vivo Y51 Pro by 77.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
$1799
Vivo Y51 Pro
$230

Price difference: $1569. Vivo Y51 Pro is cheaper by $1569.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y51 Pro (32/100 vs 2/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a bit better (31/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (57/100 vs 42/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (26/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y51 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo Y51 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold edges out the Vivo Y51 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Vivo Y51 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo Y51 Pro — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo Y51 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on camera score (31/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Vivo Y51 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold leads on performance (32/100 vs 2/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Vivo Y51 Pro?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y51 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.