Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs Realme Neo7 Turbo

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (2025) runs on the Google Tensor G5, while the Realme Neo7 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e; estimated prices are $1799 and $270. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads — 70/100 vs 61/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Neo7 Turbo has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5015); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme Neo7 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,502,910 vs 1,553,009); the Realme Neo7 Turbo is noticeably lighter (205g vs 258g).

The Realme Neo7 Turbo edges out the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Performance 76
Display 78
Camera 37
Battery 53
Portability 52
Value for money 26
Realme Neo7 Turbo
Performance 84
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 85
Portability 50
Value for money 88
What makes Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2276 vs 2233

  • Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Realme Neo7 Turbo better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2502910 vs 1553009
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 7478 vs 6173
  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5015 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Lighter: 205g vs 258g
  • Cheaper: $270 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (84/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better value for money (88/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs the Realme Neo7 Turbo, the Realme Neo7 Turbo scores 9 points higher (70/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo leads (88/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (85/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (88/100 vs 26/100).

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Realme Neo7 Turbo: The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Realme Neo7 Turbo
Processor Google Tensor G5 MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
AnTuTu 1553009 2502910
Geekbench Single 2276 2233
Geekbench Multi 6173 7478
Display 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2152x2076 1280x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5015 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 15W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 155.2×150.4×5.2 mm 162.4×76.1×8.6 mm
Weight 258 g 205 g
Price $1799 $270
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
37
camera
Realme Neo7 Turbo
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 8.0" Super Actua Flex LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2152x2076
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Realme Neo7 Turbo
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
  • 5015 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
53
battery
Realme Neo7 Turbo
  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless charging: no data
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Realme Neo7 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold Google Tensor G5
61/100
1553009 AnTuTu
Realme Neo7 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
70/100 +38.0%
2502910 AnTuTu

Realme Neo7 Turbo leads Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by 38.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold
$1799
Realme Neo7 Turbo
$270

Price difference: $1529. Realme Neo7 Turbo is cheaper by $1529.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (85/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Realme Neo7 Turbo significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (88/100 vs 26/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo edges out the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Realme Neo7 Turbo — 70/100.

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold or the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Realme Neo7 Turbo leads on performance (84/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold over the Realme Neo7 Turbo?

The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Realme Neo7 Turbo is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.